![]() Not from Chara (logically) and certainly not from the Player. ![]() Only recently I remembered, compared the information and was surprised. I used to notice that it was in the first person, but I didn't pay much attention to it. Accordingly, this choice is also given by Frisk. ![]() What kind of home could Chara have? And given the situation, it was strange for him to think about it. And here again there is a mention that Frisk wants to go home, and it is written in the first person. When were the options in the first person? At first, there was no proof of this, except for assumptions, but now I have a moment from the game where the actions are performed in the first person: Nochoco, on top of everything else, mentioned that ACTION options are provided by both Chara and Frisk for the Player, and not just by Chara alone. In addition, it was considered where and how the last fallen human resisted the Player. In addition, I also considered in my own theory that the path of genocide is the culmination of Chara's personality (where he shows his TRUE identity, and doesn't change because of the Player), and the path of a True Pacifist is the culmination of Frisk's personality (and here). Determination is not a trait, but a driving force present in all human souls. The first thing I want to say is about the theories concerning the essence of the red soul and that its true purpose is actually "to be yourself" (you can click on the highlighted words and you will go to the theories with evidence). In addition, this theory also uses the theory that Chara is the narrator. WARNING: I will talk about Chara and Frisk in the masculine gender.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |